ResultsandDiscussion
Stability of non-indigenous bacteria by detection of specific genes
The absolute copy number of mtrA gene decreased more than 10 folds from 10 days to 20 days (5.67x105 to 5.29x104), and approximately 2 folds from 20 days to 50 days (2.43x104) (Fig. 2). In case of XRE gene, the decrease rate was higher from 1.06x103 at 10 days to non-detectable at 50 days, than that of mtrA (Fig. 2). Although XRE gene was not detected at 50 days, with still a high copy number of mtrA gene (approximately four orders of magnitude), looking at the data at 20 days, the addition of the Bt and MR-1 strains in the microcosms demonstrated relative stability of added bacterial strains in soils. An inference to the higher copy number of mtrA than XRE gene could be due to paralogy of mtrA in S. oneidensis MR-1 genome, which has over 50% gene similarity [25, 26].
Diversity indices by plant growth and non-indigenous bacteria
The effect of adding bacterial inoculants on the soil resident microorganisms was also determined. Based on the normalized read numbers using the minimum read count of 7,605 from the sample T0, the soil sample at the start of the experiment (T0) showed the highest number of 1,956 OTUs which decreased after 30 days (T30-Ctrl; 1,770 OTUs), but slight less decreases of OTU counts were observed in the rhizosphere soils inoculated with Bt (T30-Bt; 1,822 OTUs) and MR-1 (T30-MR1; 1,799 OTUs) (Table 1). Chao1 index, representing estimated species richness indicated the similar trend about the non-inoculated controls, with the highest value at T0 (4,030 OTUs) which later decreased after 30 days (T30-Ctrl; 3,860 OTUs). Similarly, the Shannon and inverse Simpson indices, representing both species richness and evenness showed higher values at the start of the experiment (T0), and also indicated decreases in both the control and the inoculated pots after 30 days, which may suggest that plants may have affected the diversity loss possibly due to heterotrophic bacterial growths by plant-derived organic materials. Interestingly, Shannon and inverse Simpson indices showed less decrease in the inoculated pots than those in the control (Table 1), suggesting a potential of non-native bacterial introduction effect on native microbial community.
Bacterial community by plant growth and non-indigenous bacteria
Composition of the bacterial communities was determined and classified into 21 phyla. There was dramatic increases of phylum Cyanobacteria in all three samples after 30 days (Fig. 3). Cyanobacteria has been known to promote plant growth by supplying nutrients through soil organic carbon amendment and nitrogen fixation [27]. Although it is speculative for the opposite notion, there may be a potential that plant growth has increased the Cyanobacteria in the soils and rhizosphere. Proteobacteria have increased in the incubated soils with the barley plants, while Acidobacteria was observed to have decreased. Both Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria has been known to be dominant in forest soils [28], and substantial portions of members of Proteobacteria are heterotrophs, suggesting possible addition of organic carbon to the soils from the plants.
Heatmap representing sequence abundance at genus level indicated that only several genera were dominant with most of genera in minor ratios, by visualizing the top 40 genera among the total 307 genera (Fig. 4). The dominant bacterial genera also appeared to be correlated somewhat with each other, indicated by the vertical dendrogram. The horizontal dendrogram correlating the samples based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity showed the similar results with those from diversity indices (Table 1) and community distribution at phylum level (Fig. 3). The initial soil (T0) was most different from the planted soils, regardless of non-indigenous inoculations, after 30 days of incubation. Also, the inoculated soils (T30-MR1, T30-Bt) were differentiated from the uninoculated soil (T30-ctrl), which was suggestive that addition of external bacteria had an effect on the composition of soil microbial community in the rhizosphere at least in this study under controlled laboratory conditions.
Beta-diversity analyses
Dissimilarity distances among the samples calculated by Yue & Clayton theta distance [29] were visualized by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) (Fig. 5). The rhizosphere soil bacterial communities from the inoculated pots (T30-Bt, T30-MR1) formed a group, apart from the initial soil (T0) and the uninoculated rhizosphere soil (T30-ctrl) in both PCoA and NMDS. This might help explain differentiation of non-native bacteria introduction to soils from uninoculated rhizosphere soil. Based on the UniFrac analysis that compares similarity of the samples by incorporating phylogenetic distances of the microorganisms [30], the communities from the inoculated rhizosphere soils (T30-Bt, T30-MR1) were separated from the initial (T0) and uninoculated (T30-ctrl) soils (Fig. 6), which was similar with the results from community distribution (Fig. 3, 4) and ordination analyses (Fig. 5). This is also suggestive of non-native bacterial introduction effect on the rhizosphere soils.
Effect of non-indigenous bacteria introduction
It is important to note that the sequences of the inoculated Bacillus and Shewanella were not detected. This suggests that bacterial inoculants were unsuccessful to colonize the rhizosphere. Also, the specific genes, XRE and mtrA of the inoculated Bacillus and Shewanella, decreased in detected copy numbers over time. Nonetheless there were bacterial diversity separations between the inoculated and uninoculated soils, identified by heatmap, ordination, and UniFrac analyses. This might suggest that introduction of non-native microbes may have influences on the soil microbial community and diversity, even though the introduced microorganisms do not survive long or colonize dominantly.
Viability of the introduced bacteria in the soil environment would be one of the major issues for certain purposes, such as microbial pesticides. Colonization of the bacterial inoculants on the rhizosphere would be a challenge, particularly if the bacterial strain is added for plant-growth promoting activities. Other factors such as appropriate carrier of the bacterial inoculum as well as method of application should be taken into consideration, which will aid the survival of the bacterial strain in the soil environment [11].
Note
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Gupta, A., Gupta, R., & Singh,R.
((2017)).
Microbes and Environment. in: Singh R, Principles and applications of environmental biotechnology for a sustainable future..
43
- 84.
2. Wilpiszeski, R., Aufrecht, J., Retterer, S., Sullivan, M., Graham, D., Pierce, E., Zablocki, O., Palumbo, A., & Elias,D.
((2019)).
Soil aggregate microbial communities: Towards understanding microbiome interactions at biologically relevant scales..
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
85.
e00324
- 00319.
3. Ahmad, M., Pataczek, L., Hilger, TH., Zahir, ZA., Hussain, A., Rasche, F., Schafleitner, R., & Solberg,S.
((2018)).
Perspectives of microbial inoculation for sustainable development and environmental management..
Frontiers in Microbiology
9.
2992.
4. Carvalho,FP.
((2017)).
Pesticides, environment, and food safety..
Food and Energy Security
6.
48
- 60.
5. Wu, F., & Butz,WP.
((2004)).
The future of genetically modified crops: Lessons from the green revolution.
11
- 38.
6. Tahat M, M., Alananbeh K, M., Othman Y, A., & Leskovar D,I.
((2020)).
Soil health and sustainable agriculture..
Sustainability
12.
4859.
7. Ajiboye, TO., Kuvarega, AT., & Onwudiwe,DC.
((2020)).
Recent strategies for environmental remediation of organochlorine pesticides..
Applied Sciences
10.
6286.
8. Liu, L., Li, W., Song, W., & Guo,M.
((2018)).
Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability..
Science of The Total Environment
633.
206
- 219.
9. Thakur, M., Medintz, IL., & Walper,SA.
((2019)).
Enzymatic bioremediation of organophosphate compounds—Progress and remaining challenges..
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
7.
289.
10. Yan, W., Xiao, Y., Ding, R., Wang, S., & Zhao,F.
((2019)).
The effect of bioelectrochemical systems on antibiotics removal and antibiotic resistance genes: A review..
Chemical Engineering Journal
358.
1421
- 1437.
11. Backer, R., Rokem, JS., Ilangumaran, G., Lamont, J., Praslickova, D., Ricci, E., Subramanian, S., & Smith,DL.
((2018)).
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture..
Frontiers in Plant Science
9.
1473.
12. Jacoby, R., Peukert, M., Succurro, A., Koprivova, A., & Kopriva,S.
((2017)).
The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—Current knowledge and future directions..
Frontiers in Plant Science
8.
1617.
13. Malla, MA., Dubey, A., Yadav, S., Kumar, A., Hashem, A., & Abd_Allah,EF.
((2018)).
Understanding and designing the strategies for the microbe-mediated remediation of environmental contaminants using omics approaches..
Frontiers in Microbiology
9.
1132.
14. Timmusk, S., Behers, L., Muthoni, J., Muraya, A., & Aronsson,A-C.
((2017)).
Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement..
Frontiers in Plant Science
8.
49.
15. Trabelsi, D., & Mhamdi,R.
((2013)).
Microbial inoculants and their impact on soil microbial communities: A review..
BioMed Research International
2013.
863240.
16. Wei, S., Chelliah, R., Park, B-J., Kim, S-H., Forghani, F., Cho, MS., Park, D-S., Jin, Y-G., & Oh,D-H.
((2019)).
Differentiation of Bacillus thuringiensis from Bacillus cereus group using a unique marker based on real-time PCR..
Frontiers in Microbiology
10.
883.
17. Pitts, KE., Dobbin, PS., Reyes-Ramirez, F., Thomson, AJ., Richardson, DJ., & Seward,HE.
((2003)).
Characterization of the Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 decaheme cytochrome MtrA: Expression in Escherichia coli confers the ability to reduce soluble Fe(III) chelate..
Journal of Biological Chemistry
278.
27758
- 27765.
18. Ye, J., Coulouris, G., Zaretskaya, I., Cutcutache, I., Rozen, S., & Madden,TL.
((2012)).
Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction..
BMC Bioinformatics
13.
134.
19. Nogrado, K., Lee, S., Chon, K., & Lee,J-H.
((2019)).
Effect of transient exposure to carbaryl wettable powder on the gut microbial community of honey bees..
Applied Biological Chemistry
62.
6.
20. Ritalahti, KM., Amos, BK., Sung, Y., Wu, Q., Koenigsberg, SS., & Löffler,FE.
((2006)).
Quantitative PCR targeting 16S rRNA and teductive dehalogenase genes simultaneously monitors multiple Dehalococcoides strains..
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
72.
2765
- 2774.
21. Schloss, PD., Westcott, SL., Ryabin, T., Hall, JR., Hartmann, M., Hollister, EB., Lesniewski, RA., Oakley, BB., Parks, DH., & null,null.
((2009)).
Introducing mothur: Open-source, platformindependent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities..
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
75.
7537
- 7541.
22. Kozich, JJ., Westcott, SL., Baxter, NT., Highlander, SK., & Schloss,PD.
((2013)).
Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform..
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
79.
5112
- 5120.
23. Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., & Glockner,FO.
((2013)).
The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools..
Nucleic Acids Research
41.
D590
- 596.
24. Cole, JR., Wang, Q., Fish, JA., Chai, B., McGarrell, DM., Sun, Y., Brown, CT., Porras-Alfaro, A., Kuske, CR., & null,null.
((2013)).
Ribosomal database project: Data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis..
Nucleic Acids Research
42.
D633
- D642.
25. Coursolle, D., & Gralnick,J.
((2012)).
Reconstruction of extracellular respiratory pathways for iron(III) reduction in Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1..
Frontiers in Microbiology
3.
56.
26. Coursolle, D., & Gralnick,JA.
((2010)).
Modularity of the Mtr respiratory pathway of Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1..
Molecular Microbiology
77.
995
- 1008.
27. Prasanna, R., Chaudhary, V., Gupta, V., Babu, S., Kumar, A., Singh, R., Shivay, YS., & Nain,L.
((2013)).
Cyanobacteria mediated plant growth promotion and bioprotection against Fusarium wilt in tomato..
European Journal of Plant Pathology
136.
337
- 353.
28. Miyashita,NT.
((2015)).
Contrasting soil bacterial community structure between the phyla Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria in tropical Southeast Asian and temperate Japanese forests..
Genes Genet Syst
90.
61
- 77.
29. Yue, JC., & Clayton,MK.
((2005)).
A similarity measure based on species proportions..
Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
34.
2123
- 2131.
30. Lozupone, C., Lladser, ME., Knights, D., Stombaugh, J., & Knight,R.
((2011)).
UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison..
The ISME Journal
5.
169
- 172.